What Doesn't Constitute Strong/Stronger Evidence? Many people mistakenly believe that merely adding more personal experiences or opinions to an argument strengthens its validity. However, weak arguments often rely on logical fallacies, cognitive biases, or poor methodologies that do not align with rigorous scientific standards. Here are a few common examples:
What Constitutes "Stronger Evidence" than Already Strong Evidence? Stronger evidence is determined by factors that enhance reliability, validity, and reproducibility. When evaluating competing scientific claims, the following aspects indicate even stronger evidence:
Conclusion The Importance of Peer-Reviewed Research To develop well-informed opinions, individuals should prioritize peer-reviewed, scientifically validated evidence over anecdotes and personal observations. While personal experiences are valuable, they should not outweigh large-scale, controlled studies that have undergone rigorous scrutiny. Being open to changing one’s position in light of new evidence is not a weakness—it is the foundation of intellectual honesty and scientific progress. References
This article is the first in a series exploring scientific literacy and utilizing it as a combat sports coach. Stay tuned for the next installment.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorJason Clarke. Owner & Head Coach of Iowa City Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu & Close Range Tactics Categories
All
Archives
January 2025
|